Containers in Containers

Comments

2 comments

  • Jacob Gardiner

    Bump. Flex Customer Success Team

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Aaron Horn

    Hey Mac & Jacob, while I think it's a good feature request, the satisfying of Storage Requirements is not designed to work in a tiered fashion (containers within containers). Only items directly in the container satisfy that container's requirements, as you may have discovered.

    However, the container within the container can have its own Storage Requirements.  In Mac's original example, the Small Bag would have its own requirements that are satisfied by its contents.  Then the Shipping Case would have the Small Bag as part of its requirements, but not the Small Bag's contents since those would be a part of the Small Bag's requirements and contents.  You would have 2 content builder processes to do in this scenario.  You can continue this trend down as many tiers as you need to go (container, within container, within container, etc.)

    I've done this sort of structure for clients, and it works well if staff is trained properly.  Let me know if you would like some direct consulting help. I'm endorsed by Flex.

    Aaron Horn
    Flex Endorsed Consultant
    aaronjhorn@gmail.com

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.